MSI X99A TOMAHAWK (MS-7A54)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A54
MotherboardMSI X99A TOMAHAWK (MS-7A54)  (all builds)
Memory34 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160913
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateJun 12 '17 at 11:43
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 209
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 771
71% 594 Pts
64-Core 1,088
67% 1,088 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 114
Parallax 112
90% 112 fps
MRender 98.7
Gravity 104
Splatting 103
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 507
Write 408
Mixed 423
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 22.4
105% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 28.5
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 124
101% 135 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 135%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 133
Write 134
Mixed 117
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 2.24
4K Mixed 0.2
91% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
857GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 114
Write 104
Mixed 99.6
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.36
4K Mixed 0.2
98% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 101%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
14GB free, PID 0732
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 40.7
Write 13.8
Mixed 13.9
24% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.34
4K Write 0.41
4K Mixed 0.85
66% 2.54 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
140% Outstanding
MC Read 57.2
MC Write 59.7
MC Mixed 51.4
160% 56.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 21.6
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 54.6
73% 54.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 140%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A TOMAHAWK (MS-7A54) Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A TOMAHAWK (MS-7A54)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $429
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback