Average Bench: 87.8% (27th of 108)

Based on 93,836 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GVKB 2x8GB

Very good average bench

The G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB averaged just 12.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 34.7GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 30.6GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB is 44.4%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 72.4ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 21.9GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 93,836 samples)
Min Avg Max
25.3 MC Read 34.7 44.6
18 MC Write 30.6 41.3
19.6 MC Mixed 29.1 35.5
89.9% 31.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
15 SC Read 21.9 26.9
17.5 SC Write 30.1 42.6
18.9 SC Mixed 27.5 34.8
75.7% 26.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
48.1 Latency 72.4 98.5
55.3% 72.4 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
MC Read 46.9
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 37.2
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 30.8
96% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 44.5
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 34
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 41.5
SC Mixed 29.7
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 33.9
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 30.9
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 31.1
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 26.7
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 25.1
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 29.7
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 49.3
81% 49.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 34.8
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 33.2
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.2
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 16.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 49.8
80% 49.8 ns
93,836 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 21,170,124 RAM Kits tested.

 Prices

AmazonUS $651 day
OutletPCUS $771 month
Send price feedback
Typical Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB Builds (Compare 22,254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $142

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $652

Popular Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

11 months ago.

worked @3200 in Ryzen 1600X Asus Prime X370 -PRO worked at 1st try..............


Good

3 months ago.

Clocks well in the MSI B450 Gaming plus w\ Ryzen 3 2200G.


Poor

9 months ago.

XMP Profile (3200Mhz) does not work with ASUS B350 PLUS / Ryzen 5 1600X


Your
opinion?
108 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 580 $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $334Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback