Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170508
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '17 at 16:58
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110 23,169 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 82 1-Core 102 2-Core 202 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 375 8-Core 512 56% 443 Pts	64-Core 516 32% 516 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Lighting 76.3 Reflection 75.6 Parallax 65.5 62% 72.5 fps	MRender 72.2 Gravity 70.5 Splatting 71.3 58% 71.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 349GB free Firmware: SC13 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 77 180881258 (03) Spinup time 99 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 37 37 65535 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 282315817 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 18103 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2165 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 4022 (BC) Unknown 100 98 4 (BD) vendor-specific 2 2 98 (BE) vendor-specific 77 51 387383319 (C2) HDA temperature 23 49 47244640279 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 50 21 180881258 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 4 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 4 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	19.1% Very poor	Read 11.2 Write 55 Mixed 8.25 18% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.41 99% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 60%
Seagate ST3400620AS 400GB-$55 3,016 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 269GB free Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 94 147545717 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2945 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 64562360 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3833 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1811 (BB) vendor-specific 88 88 12 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 53 454230043 (C2) HDA temperature 27 47 38654705691 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 82 58 133042606 (C5) Current pending sector count 1 1 4294967294 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 1 1 4294967294 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	43% Average	Read 71.3 Write 78.4 Mixed 74 56% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.29 91% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 42%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40 13,720 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 239GB free (System drive) Firmware: 17.01H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 139 136 4033 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2540 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6752 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2522 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 160 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2379 (C2) HDA temperature 115 90 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	52.3% Above average	Read 94.8 Write 87.6 Mixed 86.5 68% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 0.73 4K Mixed 0.36 79% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
AMD R538G1601U2S- Transcend TS512MLK72V6N Patriot PSD38G16002 Transcend TS512MLK72V6N 24GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.4% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 18.7 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 11.9 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel E5 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

CPU
Xeon E5-2665 0IntelBench 67%, 1,061 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2660 0IntelBench 63%, 1,318 samples	1x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 8500 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 4,580 samples	1x
GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	1x
M667 120G 120GBShinediskBench 56%, 237 samples	1x
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples	1x

RAM
1x8GBDimm6_ManufacturerBench 25%, 7 samples	2x
HMT151R7TFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 66%, 190 samples	1x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 10% - Terrible

Total price: $89

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16