Biostar B75MU3+

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	64% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar B75MU3+ (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120508
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '17 at 09:51
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	91%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel @ 2.20GHz 62 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 137 58% 96.1 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 265 36% 265 Pts	64-Core 265 16% 265 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% EVGA(3842 2983) CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	64% Good	Lighting 81.2 Reflection 86.9 Parallax 76.4 66% 81.5 fps	MRender 78.8 Gravity 74.1 Splatting 68.7 60% 73.9 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 66%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199 10,165 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 75 75 179318515 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 123231201687562 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1043 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 37 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 179318515 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 179318515 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 179318515 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 63104 (EA) Unknown 0 0 60407 (F1) Unknown 0 0 60407 (F2) Unknown 0 0 81690	38.2% Below average	Read 212 Write 157 Mixed 128 37% 166 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 8.13 64% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 20.8 DQ Write 68.1 DQ Mixed 8.25 17% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1333 04EF Team--Elite-1333 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1333 04EF Team--Elite-1333 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.7% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.1 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 14.4 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B75MU3+ Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar B75MU3+

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	12x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	5x
Xeon E3-1230 V2Intel $266Bench 70%, 8,235 samples	3x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	5x
R7 370AMD $153Bench 21%, 39,178 samples	3x
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	3x

SSD
256GB SSD 256GBLexarBench 111%, 12,615 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	2x

RAM
HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 53%, 1,525 samples	4x
1600 CL9 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 7,092 samples	3x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 40%, 763 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $297

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16