Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121128
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '21 at 17:58
Run Duration	353 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 75.1 1-Core 89.8 2-Core 166 64% 110 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 440 46% 368 Pts	64-Core 434 27% 434 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Lighting 21.3 Reflection 18.7 Parallax 21.3 17% 20.4 fps	MRender 25.2 Gravity 23.2 Splatting 17.2 17% 21.9 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 55 54 58 57 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 413 Write 207 Mixed 201 SusWrite 61.8 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 52 4K Mixed 29.8 106% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 225 173% 239 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 253GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 326 325 330 330 324 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 336 Write 217 Mixed 243 SusWrite 325 63% 280 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 45.9 4K Mixed 33.7 113% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 251 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 180 148% 212 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 126%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 1,997 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 310GB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 90 91 93 90 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	9.76% Terrible	Read 63.3 Write 61.4 Mixed 86.2 SusWrite 89.4 17% 75.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 8.4 4K Mixed 0.7 6% 3.17 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 2.6 DQ Mixed 2.2 2% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.76% Great: 18%
WD WD2000JD-00HBB0 200GB 2,211 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 106GB free Firmware: 08.05J08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 52 53 53 53 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 56.1 Write 51.6 Mixed 40.4 SusWrite 52 37% 50 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 32%
WD WD2000JD-00HBB0 200GB 2,211 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 79GB free Firmware: 08.05J08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 45 45 45 45 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 50.4 Write 50.8 Mixed 38.9 SusWrite 45.2 34% 46.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 32%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 22,017 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 66 68 68 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 61.4 Write 91.3 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 65.9 54% 72 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.5 157% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 66%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB 737 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 48GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 73 73 73 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 84.3 Write 13 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 66.3 56% 47.4 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.6 112% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 859B BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 12.3 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 90.1 44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,009 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,523x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	950x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	557x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	310x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	269x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	237x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	173x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	140x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	107x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	90x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	86x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	81x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $581

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16