| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130123 |
| Uptime | 3.7 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 09 '21 at 12:11 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | CHE-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.9%
Good
|
54% 85.6 Pts
|
36% 300 Pts
|
23% 378 Pts
|
| Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
Device(4D50 4449) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4300 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 461.72
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.4%
Below average
|
33% 39.5 fps
|
34% 42.8 fps
| |
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2856 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
61.7%
Good
|
58% 75.6 fps
|
69% 84.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275
450GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 273 271 262 271 275 MB/s
|
80.2%
Excellent
|
64% 285 MB/s
|
140% 47.3 MB/s
|
118% 151 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.5%
Average
|
44% 15.5 GB/s
|
28% 9.63 GB/s
|
54% 74.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-990FXA-UD5 Builds (Compare 332 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 - $192
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 143x |
| FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 28x |
| FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 24x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 25x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 18x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $490 |