Asus VC60

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus VC60  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK VC60
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140624
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 09 '21 at 17:54
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
PGA989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 82.9
1-Core 66
2-Core 128
57% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 168
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.5
3% 2.6 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 51 48 50 51 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 448
Write 393
Mixed 280
SusWrite 91
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 31
98% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 180
186% 304 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 108%
HGST HTS 545050A7E680 500GB
206GB free, PID 7788
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 88 74 87 84 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.1% Below average
Read 96.1
Write 90.7
Mixed 38
SusWrite 84.4
102% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 37%
WD My Book 500GB
206GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 40 40 41 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
21% Poor
Read 37.8
Write 36.5
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 39.8
48% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21%
Great: 22%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 74.3
Write 19
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 13.1
35% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
61% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-053.A00LF 99U5428-063.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.9
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 14.4
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VC60 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VC60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback