Asrock X79 Extreme9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme9  (all builds)
Memory52.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140214
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMar 27 '21 at 14:21
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 184
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 563
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 718
44% 718 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Palit(1569 1184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.8% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 45.2
Parallax 38.2
27% 38.8 fps
MRender 51
Gravity 44.7
Splatting 36.4
35% 44 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 512GB-$500
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 150 140 142 142 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 406
Write 236
Mixed 190
SusWrite 151
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 23.3
88% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 69.4
DQ Mixed 121
103% 157 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 85%
Marvell Raid VD 0 1TB
795GB free
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 467 482 487 481 486 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 521
Write 517
Mixed 399
SusWrite 477
108% 478 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 23.5
79% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 172
129% 175 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 117%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
133GB free
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 220 227 221 219 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 297
Write 230
Mixed 254
SusWrite 188
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 38.6
131% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 118
91% 124 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
33GB free
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 220 227 221 172 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 303
Write 212
Mixed 228
SusWrite 180
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 38.5
130% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 115
89% 122 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 126%
Disk Name 252GB
82GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 26 27 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.6% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 27.1
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 26.8
37% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.4
174% 3.97 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2400 C10 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 30.5
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Extreme9 Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme9 - $1,200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,960
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback