SZMZ X99M-G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	SZMZ X99M-G2 (all builds)
Motherboard	SZMZ X99M-G2
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200811
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '21 at 23:09
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 3,953 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 76.2 1-Core 76.6 2-Core 155 60% 103 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 500 46% 382 Pts	64-Core 1,013 63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% MSI(1462 8D92) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	44.1% Average	Lighting 57.3 Reflection 58.6 Parallax 50.4 47% 55.4 fps	MRender 42.8 Gravity 52.5 Splatting 47.7 39% 47.7 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V-gen09sm20ar256sdknvme 256GB 256GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 208% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0629A3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,875 Write 1,541 Mixed 1,244 345% 1,553 MB/s	4K Read 53.5 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 39 196% 71.8 MB/s	DQ Read 658 DQ Write 539 DQ Mixed 610 454% 602 MB/s
Poor: 141% Great: 258%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 418GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 129 130 130 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 132 Write 125 Mixed 65.8 SusWrite 129 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 88%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 13GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 3.4 2.9 3.4 2.8 3.4 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	8.29% Terrible	Read 39.5 Write 4 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 3 12% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 30% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.29% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 1x16GB 357 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 9.6 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 7.4 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 87.9 46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99M-G2 Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: SZMZ X99M-G2

CPU
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	22x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	14x
Xeon E5-2630L v3IntelBench 67%, 702 samples	12x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	17x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	9x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	6x

SSD
SSD 120GBGigabyte $31Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	7x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	5x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	4x

RAM
Atermiter 1x8GBUnknownBench 30%, 346 samples	11x
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 1x16GBHynixBench 37%, 604 samples	8x
18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 2x8GBMicronBench 59%, 641 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $161

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16