Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	96.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	76.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 55.9 1-Core 83.6 2-Core 167 56% 102 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 634 58% 486 Pts	64-Core 1,618 100% 1,618 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	96.3% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 148 Parallax 141 95% 135 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 139 Splatting 110 98% 121 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial_CT1050MX 1TB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 856GB free (System drive) Firmware: R040 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Read 475 Write 484 Mixed 487 108% 482 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 45.1 4K Mixed 26.8 84% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 21.3 DQ Write 58.2 DQ Mixed 15.5 19% 31.7 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 99%
Hds722020ala330 RSD HUA 2TB 1,166 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1.5TB free Firmware: JKAOA31D Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 105 (03) Spinup time 117 117 51580109419 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 589 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 112 112 39 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 45631 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 301 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 597 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 597 (C2) HDA temperature 240 240 317828300825 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	59.6% Above average	Read 111 Write 96.6 Mixed 98.5 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.31 87% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT8GC72C4NG0NK-CG NT8GC72C4NG0NK-CG NT8GC72C4NG0NK-CG NT8GC72C4NG0NK-CG Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 NT8GC72C4NG0NK-CG NT8GC72C4NG0... 128GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 61.5 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 32.1 120% 42 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 140 28% 140 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 101%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	146x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16