Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3450-$59 34,199 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 89.2 1-Core 96.1 2-Core 191 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 359 48% 359 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7750 22,655 User benchmarks, average bench 8% XFX(1682 3245) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.14535.3005 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	8.3% Terrible	Lighting 9.6 Reflection 17.2 Parallax 16.8 8% 14.5 fps	MRender 12.8 Gravity 9.6 Splatting 11.4 9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.3% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB 10,673 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 329GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA650 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 120 111 109 110 110 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Read 128 Write 130 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 112 72% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR5040ED58E9W1600 04CB 8GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.7 27% 9.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 9.6 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 68.3 59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	19x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	16x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	8x

RAM
RMR5030ME68F9F1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 50%, 1,084 samples	10x
RMR5030ME68F9F1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 28%, 1,021 samples	9x
RMR5030ME68F9F1600 4x4GBRamaxelBench 54%, 292 samples	4x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $335

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16