MSI H270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64)

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7A64
Motherboard	MSI H270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64) (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '17 at 00:56
Run Duration	340 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Memory 92.8 1-Core 123 2-Core 236 86% 151 Pts	4-Core 434 8-Core 674 68% 554 Pts	64-Core 672 42% 672 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3285) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.2% Average	Lighting 52.9 Reflection 58 Parallax 50.8 43% 53.9 fps	MRender 61.7 Gravity 58.3 Splatting 60 49% 60 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141 6,458 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C4005T2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 180 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 89 (64) Unknown 100 100 273344 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 0 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 22 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 0 0 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 4 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 9502 (B3) Unknown 0 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 37 100 197569871909 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 750 (F1) Unknown 100 100 703 (F2) Unknown 100 100 588 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 2190	148% Outstanding	Read 1,188 Write 758 Mixed 872 208% 939 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 19.4 131% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 411 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 19.9 108% 248 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 159%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 836GB free Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 64621376 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6385 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 180566157001 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 12167 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 4037 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 8590065696 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 50 588972066 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 812 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 82 82 37913 (C2) HDA temperature 34 50 64424509474 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 1 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 1 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 139723876082633 (F1) Unknown 100 253 56619742647902 (F2) Unknown 100 253 -7400790914395	98.1% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 173 Mixed 161 126% 168 MB/s	4K Read 1.11 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.44 126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 112%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB 12,066 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	4.73% Terrible	Read 19.8 Write 3.59 Mixed 5.71 9% 9.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.53 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.003 17% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.73% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB 13,788 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	74.9% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 22.5 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 23.8 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64) Builds (Compare 298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI H270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64)

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	95x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	50x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	37x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	52x
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	36x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	32x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	9x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	16x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	12x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $446

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16