Average Bench: 71.5% (78th of 115)

Based on 98,777 user benchmarks.  Models: G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GVR 2x8GB, G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GVS 2x8GB, G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GVB 2x8GB

Good average bench

The G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB averaged 28.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 27.4GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 26.3GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB is 43.9%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 17.1GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 79.1ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 98,777 samples)
Min Avg Max
14.7 MC Read 27.4 33.8
14.8 MC Write 26.3 33
13 MC Mixed 22.6 29.2
72.6% 25.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
11.1 SC Read 17.1 23.2
14.4 SC Write 25.4 33.6
13.5 SC Mixed 21.6 27.3
61.1% 21.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
59.4 Latency 79.1 108
50.5% 79.1 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 26.6
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 22.8
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 21.6
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 19.8
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 19
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 20.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 11.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
98,777 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,358,449 RAM Kits tested

 Prices

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

MSRP ≈ $78 @ launch in Aug '15
EbayUS F4-2400C15D-16GVB $3122 mins
AmazonUS F4-2400C15D-16GVR $4011 mins
AmazonUS F4-2400C15D-16GVB $4425 days
AmazonUS F4-2400C15D-16GVS $446 days
Send price feedback
Typical Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB Builds (Compare 8,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $779

Popular Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 8 years ago.

Good

3 years ago.

OC'd to 3066 mhz. Timings 15-18-18-38. V1.4. Stable. Older but you get get your use out of it.


Good

5 years ago.

Not a terribly bad memory kit. Mine are using Hynix ICs (I think they're MFR/M-die, but I can't quite remember at the moment - use Thaiphoon Burner to check which ICs your memory/DRAM uses). I was able to quite easily overclock to 3200 MT/s 16-18-18-36 1T @ 1.35V on both Intel and AMD (Ryzen/AM4) platforms. I didn't try anything further, but if I ever get around to using this memory on one of the test benches again, I may try to push it as far as I can get it.

Info  www.userbenchmark.com/...

My run with an Intel Core i7-7700K and MSI Z170A MPower Gaming Titanium.

Info  www.userbenchmark.com/...

My run with an AMD Ryzen 5 1400 and MSI B450M Mortar. Memory bandwidth is much better with Ryzen, as you can see.


Good

5 years ago.

Pretty good. Doesn't run at 2400 due to my motherboard, but RAM speed doesn't matter too much with Intel, so no problems there.


Good

6 years ago.

very good but you can get better for the price


Poor

3 years ago.

slow


Your
opinion?
115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback