Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2440 0 170 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	42.7% Average	Memory 54.2 1-Core 22.5 2-Core 79.1 32% 51.9 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 340 30% 254 Pts	64-Core 540 33% 540 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 377.55 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Lighting 20.4 Reflection 17.1 Parallax 19.8 17% 19.1 fps	MRender 23.2 Gravity 23 Splatting 16 16% 20.7 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$33 20,238 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 183 120 74 75 74 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.4% Below average	Read 132 Write 118 Mixed 133 SusWrite 118 28% 125 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 27.6 4K Mixed 12.8 48% 17.1 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 142 114% 158 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 91%
Dell PERC H710 6TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4.5TB free Firmware: 3.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 130 119 133 140 136 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	61% Good	Read 483 Write 234 Mixed 495 SusWrite 130 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 28.8 82% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 115 102% 153 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 61%
Dell PERC H710 3TB 2.5TB free Firmware: 3.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 77 81 65 62 67 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Seagate Expansion 4TB 22,017 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 26.5 Write 26.2 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 24.9 18% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.4 99% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M391B1G73QH0-YK0 00CE000000CE M378B1G73QH0-CK0 00CE000000CE M378B1G73QH0-CK0 00CE000000CE M378B1G73QH0-CK0 40GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.1% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 15.6 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 4.1 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

RAM
18KSF1G72PDZ-1G6E1 00CE00B300CE M393B1G73QH0-YK0 00CE00B300CE M393B1G73QH0-YK0 24GBUnknownBench 72%, 7 samples	4x
M393B1K70DH0-YK0 00AD00B300AD HMT31GR7CFR4A-PB 00CE04B300CE M393B1K70DH0-YK0 00CE04B300CE M393B1K70DH0-YK0 00CE04B300CE M393B1K70DH0-YK0 00AD00B300AD HMT31GR7CFR4A-PB 48GBUnknownBench 75%, 5 samples	4x
HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 04EF000004EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 04EF000004EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 00AD000000AD HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 04EF000004EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 04EF000004EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 48GBUnknownBench 61%, 5 samples	4x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16