Asus P8P67 LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 LE  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 12:50
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 514
53% 425 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.8% Poor
Lighting 34.4
Reflection 43.6
Parallax 30.7
28% 36.2 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 27.1
27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 168 161 153 146 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 468
Write 443
Mixed 366
SusWrite 178
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 40.4
135% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 366
275% 367 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
628GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 90 90 91 92 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 61.4
Write 49.5
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 89.3
46% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.2% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.4
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 39: 4R 5G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
39% 16% 83 162 102 60 49" 2560 1440 SNY7E04 SONY TV *00
History: Score 19: 2R 1G 6B | Score 39: 4R 5G 4B
Typical P8P67 LE Builds (Compare 1,236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 LE - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $639
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback