Asus P8P67

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1440 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110627
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '21 at 10:43
Run Duration	262 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	66%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$187 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	48.2% Average	Memory 71.1 1-Core 65.7 2-Core 103 50% 79.8 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 278 24% 208 Pts	64-Core 278 17% 278 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B 2260) 1.5GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	20% Very poor	Lighting 22.7 Reflection 33.3 Parallax 28.6 18% 28.2 fps	MRender 31.8 Gravity 30.6 Splatting 23.2 23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 20 22 26 28 29 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 86%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 116GB free Firmware: Z32070RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 80 92 84 99 99 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.9% Below average	Read 276 Write 236 Mixed 168 SusWrite 96.6 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 8.8 4K Write 29.1 4K Mixed 9.7 41% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 26.2 52% 106 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 86%
ASMT 2115 3TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 24 24 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 24.5 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 23.8 33% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 3x4GB 659 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	25.9% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 7.8 24% 8.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 7.3 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 98.8 40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	446x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	358x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	199x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	118x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	103x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	96x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	39x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	34x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16