Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	27% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 85 2-Core 185 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 356 48% 356 Pts	64-Core 356 22% 356 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570 19,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1B0A 909E) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.1% Terrible	Lighting 6.6 Reflection 6.7 Parallax 5.8 5% 6.37 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 5.5 5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.1% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$50 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 98 58 74 57 56 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27% Poor	Read 234 Write 212 Mixed 191 SusWrite 75.5 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 8.7 37% 12.2 MB/s	DQ Read 5.8 DQ Write 80.7 DQ Mixed 32.4 28% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 55%
Seagate ST3500410SV 500GB-$31 2,499 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 431GB free Firmware: CV11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 133 133 133 134 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 129 Write 128 Mixed 68.7 SusWrite 130 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 6GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	43.5% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 13.3 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.9 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16