Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2620M 16,111 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Socket BGA1023, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Memory 50.4 1-Core 23 2-Core 43.1 27% 38.8 Pts	4-Core 72.9 8-Core 76.3 10% 74.6 Pts	64-Core 79.9 5% 79.9 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 0005) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.37% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 0.4 0% 0.5 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.37% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNC256GBSJ 256GB 267 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJTA0202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 112 96 48 39 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 181 Write 90.1 Mixed 101 SusWrite 74.5 25% 112 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 10.2 33% 8.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 14.7 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 7.4 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 159 25% 159 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	111x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	28x

SSD
THNSNC128GMLJ 128GBToshibaBench 31%, 189 samples	10x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	6x
THNSNC256GBSJ 256GBToshibaBench 36%, 267 samples	5x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $34

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16