PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z87M-D3H (all builds) |
Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140812 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 20 '21 at 23:12 |
Run Duration | 206 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
|
31.4%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 212 201 310 336 337 MB/s
|
85.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
421GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 158 143 175 176 178 MB/s
|
94.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 94x |
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples | 59x |
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 55x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 82x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 28x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 25x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $229 |