PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO (all builds) |
Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110823 |
Uptime | 17.8 Days |
Run Date | Nov 29 '21 at 16:52 |
Run Duration | 238 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
61.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
520GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 46 54 57 66 70 MB/s
|
32.1%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung HN-M101MBB 1TB-$45
33GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 36 37 37 MB/s
|
25.5%
Poor
|
|||
Generic External 1TB
345GB free, PID 1340
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 22 22 22 MB/s
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
316GB free, PID 1029
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.7 6.6 6.8 6.8 6.7 MB/s
|
6.96%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 74x |
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 50x |
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 35x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 14x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $516 |