Razer Blade Pro

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Blade Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Blade Pro
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170920
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 13 '22 at 04:54
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 170
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 473
51% 404 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 6758) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.4% Average
Lighting 57.9
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 59
47% 61.9 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 60.1
Splatting 61.7
51% 62.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,646
Write 1,117
Mixed 661
251% 1,141 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 56.1
188% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 975
DQ Write 85.4
DQ Mixed 164
212% 408 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
64GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 61 61 67 63 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 60.3
Write 95
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 63.4
50% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 70%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 256GB
215GB free, PID 0747
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 31 37 29 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 61.5
Write 34.7
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 32
56% 43.7 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1.6
93% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.M16FRS 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
78% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 25.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 22.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Pro Builds (Compare 295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Razer Blade Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback