HP 860-000nd

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP 860-000nd (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B4B
Memory	5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161206
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '22 at 17:10
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	47.8% Average	Memory 62 1-Core 81.4 2-Core 173 59% 106 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 241 27% 214 Pts	64-Core 306 19% 306 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Device(1B0A 90F0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37.4% Below average	Lighting 44.7 Reflection 63.4 Parallax 34.1 36% 47.4 fps	MRender 53.6 Gravity 48 Splatting 44 39% 48.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000H1 128GB 2,337 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 19 22 23 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 79%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$62 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 88GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 264 246 221 205 205 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Read 426 Write 400 Mixed 371 SusWrite 246 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 57.8 4K Mixed 27.2 112% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 343 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 354 260% 340 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 130%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 167GB free Firmware: MS2OA7C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 101 108 93 93 132 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 130 Write 137 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 106 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK8GX4M2A2133C13 Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 0215 CMK8GX4M2A2133C13 Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	47.9% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 15.9 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 11.3 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 860-000nd Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

System: HP 860-000nd

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	15x
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	12x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	3x
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 73%, 5,673 samples	6x
SD7SB6S-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 71%, 2,125 samples	5x
870 QVO 2TBSamsung $145Bench 102%, 41,734 samples	2x

RAM
KHX2133C14D4/4G Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A2 KHX2133C14D4/4G Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A2 16GBKingstonBench 70%, 6 samples	4x
M378A5143DB0-CPB 2x4GBSamsungBench 69%, 2,652 samples	3x
8ATF51264AZ-2G1A2 2x4GBMicronBench 69%, 1,575 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $380

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16