Asus K73BR

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 22 months ago.

System	Asus K73BR (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K73BR
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111121
Uptime	6.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '22 at 16:10
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Memory 51.8 1-Core 16.9 2-Core 30.1 24% 32.9 Pts	4-Core 32.1 8-Core 31.1 4% 31.6 Pts	64-Core 31.8 2% 31.8 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7400M 4,688 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 2109) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	2.06% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 2.5 2% 2.9 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 2 Splatting 2.2 2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.06% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 386GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 45 55 56 56 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 300 Write 272 Mixed 244 SusWrite 52.6 48% 217 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 20.7 4K Mixed 9.5 40% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 22.8 DQ Write 45 DQ Mixed 15.7 17% 27.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 92%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 192GB free Firmware: 12.01A12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 45 54 55 55 51 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	31.6% Below average	Read 58 Write 55.3 Mixed 39.4 SusWrite 51.7 38% 51.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GB 6,518 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 4.6 12% 4.03 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 3.1 8% 2.67 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K73BR Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 14%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K73BR

CPU
E-450 APUAMDBench 26%, 9,307 samples	3x
E2-1800 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 25%, 3,595 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 7470MAMDBench 2%, 449 samples	2x
Radeon HD 7400MAMDBench 2%, 4,688 samples	2x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x

RAM
M2S2G64CB88B5N-CG 1x2GBNanyaBench 22%, 161 samples	1x
SSA302G08-GDJEC 1x4GBAsintBench 27%, 631 samples	1x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 8GBSamsungBench 40%, 64 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus K73BR

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Asus K73BR

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)