Asus A55BM-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	7.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A55BM-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '22 at 07:18
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-6320 APU 580 User benchmarks, average bench 44% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Memory 49.7 1-Core 44.1 2-Core 62.9 34% 52.2 Pts	4-Core 40.5 8-Core 83.4 7% 62 Pts	64-Core 66.8 4% 66.8 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250E 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B A001) ≥ 4GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.1 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	7.92% Terrible	Lighting 10.1 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 14.4 8% 12.9 fps	MRender 7.1 Gravity 9.6 Splatting 9.7 7% 8.8 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.92% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 232GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 176 195 199 212 200 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.1% Good	Read 241 Write 226 Mixed 226 SusWrite 194 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 44.4 4K Mixed 33.6 110% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 160 121% 162 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 129%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 263GB free Firmware: JPFOA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 86 88 86 88 86 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 74.7 Write 78.9 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 86.1 52% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 50%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 233GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 124 120 129 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 114 Write 126 Mixed 68.7 SusWrite 122 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M391B5173QH0-CMA 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.9% Poor	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.73 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 8.8 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 162 25% 162 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A55BM-PLUS Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A55BM-PLUS

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	8x
A4-6300 APUAMD $51Bench 40%, 10,924 samples	6x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	4x
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	3x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	2x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	3x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 12GBSamsungBench 31%, 6 samples	3x
Vengeance DDR3 2000 C10 4x2GBCorsairBench 54%, 81 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16