| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920x1080x4294967296 szín |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150626 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 24 '17 at 16:48 |
| Run Duration | 199 Seconds |
| Run User | HUN-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.9%
Good
|
61% 97.5 Pts
|
41% 345 Pts
|
28% 446 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
|
54.1%
Above average
|
56% 65.9 fps
|
50% 62.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
66.3%
Good
|
70% 315 MB/s
|
96% 35.8 MB/s
|
32% 64.7 MB/s
|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
53.8%
Above average
|
56% 259 MB/s
|
84% 33.4 MB/s
|
45% 67.8 MB/s
|
|
|
63.7%
Good
|
83% 110 MB/s
|
112% 0.87 MB/s
| |
|
|
66.6%
Good
|
86% 114 MB/s
|
99% 0.85 MB/s
| |
|
|
42.7%
Average
|
55% 73 MB/s
|
57% 0.64 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron ITC 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
|
50.2%
Above average
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
34% 11.8 GB/s
|
60% 66.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,819 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 866x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 645x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 438x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 186x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 160x |
| RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples | 118x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $358 |