Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX1320 M1 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3239-A1
Memory	6.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141024
Uptime	10.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '17 at 13:09
Run Duration	251 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Memory 58.8 1-Core 101 2-Core 193 64% 117 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 378 51% 382 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 78%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
LSI MegaSR 499GB 122 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Read 190 Write 94.6 Mixed 96.1 94% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.08 4K Write 0.06 4K Mixed 0.07 12% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 83%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB 33,521 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 2GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 6.62 Mixed 8.44 16% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.85 4K Write 1.06 4K Mixed 1.08 87% 2 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B1G73QH0-YK0 Micron 18JSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 Micron 18JSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 24GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.1% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 14.6 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 14 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16