Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 11% Tree trunk	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za) 2,382 User benchmarks, average bench 24% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.28% Terrible	Memory 14.1 1-Core 8.2 2-Core 9.1 8% 10.5 Pts	4-Core 14.9 8-Core 15.7 2% 15.3 Pts	64-Core 6.7 0% 6.7 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 8.28% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310 7,882 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2B00) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	0.86% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.86% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SQ500S37480G 480GB 1,176 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 374GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3H01103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 217 276 252 266 259 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.2% Poor	Read 154 Write 120 Mixed 102 SusWrite 247 35% 156 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 2.4 10% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU5-GN-F 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	5.1% Terrible	MC Read 1.6 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 1.9 5% 1.77 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 0.6 SC Mixed 0.8 2% 0.63 GB/s	Latency 367 11% 367 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.1% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 24%, 2,382 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	5x

SSD
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 25%, 14,353 samples	2x
AM1L16BC4R1-B1GS 1x4GBAdataBench 24%, 1,734 samples	2x
M471B5173CB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 1,808 samples	1x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $70

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16