Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G Vega Gfx 94 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Memory 66.5 1-Core 92.8 2-Core 175 63% 112 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 265 36% 267 Pts	64-Core 270 17% 270 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics 27,821 User benchmarks, average bench 5% ASRock(1849 15D8) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.23.04 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	4.92% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 8 Parallax 7.1 4% 6.73 fps	MRender 7.4 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 10 6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.92% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket nano 512GB 231 User benchmarks, average bench 178% 419GB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT301.1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,144 Write 1,266 Mixed 1,165 267% 1,192 MB/s	4K Read 41.2 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 61.3 205% 74.2 MB/s	DQ Read 816 DQ Write 482 DQ Mixed 652 485% 650 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 243%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 4,823 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	MC Read 33 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 28.5 90% 31.6 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 24.3 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Ryzen Embedded R1606G Vega GfxAMDBench 53%, 98 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	2x

SSD
SSD 120GBLexarBench 61%, 1,073 samples	1x
SKC6002048G 2TBKingstonBench 112%, 432 samples	1x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S1ME-4 2x4GBKingstonBench 62%, 2,490 samples	1x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 75%, 4,823 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16