Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '22 at 02:40
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 76.5
1-Core 54.1
2-Core 108
50% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 284
30% 240 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
21% Poor
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 27
Parallax 33.2
19% 28 fps
MRender 33.2
Gravity 30.4
Splatting 26.2
24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 370 384 214 220 392 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 400
Mixed 396
SusWrite 321
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 49.3
155% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 226
175% 240 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
793GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 105 104 108 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 117
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 105
70% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 68%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
13GB free, PID a815
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.3 5.3 5.3 5 5.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.57% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 3.7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 5.1
7% 6.75 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.57%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-8GBXL0 F3-10666CL9-8GBXL0 16GB
667, 667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.4% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.8
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $515
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback