Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Memory 34.6 1-Core 14.1 2-Core 18.1 17% 22.3 Pts	4-Core 17.9 8-Core 19.9 2% 18.9 Pts	64-Core 24.1 2% 24.1 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 21FD) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.81% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.27 fps	MRender 1.4 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.81% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GB 4,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT05L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 83 83 84 74 76 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.2% Poor	Read 171 Write 80.5 Mixed 97.2 SusWrite 78.9 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 14.8 4K Mixed 10.3 36% 11.7 MB/s	DQ Read 59.1 DQ Write 44 DQ Mixed 39.9 33% 47.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CK0 Hynix HMT325S6EFR8C-PB 4GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10% Terrible	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 4 10% 3.53 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 1.8 4% 1.53 GB/s	Latency 229 18% 229 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16