Huananzhi X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics92.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardHuananzhi X79  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 02 '22 at 23:34
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 155
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 491
48% 393 Pts
64-Core 728
45% 728 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Gigabyte(1458 402B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.2% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 108
Parallax 111
94% 112 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 102
Splatting 92.6
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900KB3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 19 20 21 20 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 388
Write 370
Mixed 308
SusWrite 41.4
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 25.3
90% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 133
125% 188 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 91%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
64GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 170 141 46 181 185 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.5% Below average
Read 219
Write 206
Mixed 185
SusWrite 144
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 14.4
52% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 28.5
DQ Mixed 41.2
37% 58.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 61%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
418GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 80 79 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 84.5
Write 77.2
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 79.1
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.8
190% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 79%
Hitachi HTS541612J9SA00 120GB-$40
112GB free
Firmware: SBDOC7KP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 34.4
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 35.7
23% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 25%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB
38GB free
Firmware: 1507
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 28 28 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 25.7
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 24.7
18% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 60%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB
391GB free, PID 61b3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 31
Write 26.1
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 26.6
37% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 36.6
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback