Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 96% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 106% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	124.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170906
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '17 at 21:57
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$413 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Memory 73 1-Core 141 2-Core 272 87% 162 Pts	4-Core 511 8-Core 1,001 89% 756 Pts	64-Core 1772 110% 1772 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6694) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 387.92 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	109% Outstanding	Lighting 133 Reflection 174 Parallax 167 109% 158 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 180 Splatting 123 116% 144 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 856GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	260% Outstanding	Read 1,916 Write 1,668 Mixed 1,729 395% 1,771 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 61.3 192% 67.7 MB/s	DQ Read 604 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 216 231% 391 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 260% Great: 363%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 77 34 7005 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1707 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12541 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1699 (B5) Unknown 99 99 25628052 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 6 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 64 154619609117 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 3 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1739	71.5% Very good	Read 111 Write 138 Mixed 108 89% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.3 84% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 72%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$73 8,426 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 736GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 197 173 7108 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 470 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2140 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 460 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 44 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 425 (C2) HDA temperature 122 115 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	55.8% Above average	Read 96.6 Write 97.9 Mixed 100 74% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.18 71% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 100%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$73 8,426 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 719GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 200 174 6975 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 471 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2140 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 460 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 45 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 425 (C2) HDA temperature 120 115 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	71.6% Very good	Read 119 Write 131 Mixed 119 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.22 70% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 329GB free Firmware: MN6OA180 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 82 (03) Spinup time 186 186 34381168930 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1692 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 133 133 27 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 12359 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1690 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1954 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1954 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 171799609378 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	68% Good	Read 126 Write 111 Mixed 86.7 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.23 68% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3000C15 8x16GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	91.7% Outstanding	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 49.2 MC Mixed 30.4 104% 36.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 9.9 38% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 94.6 42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $413Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16