Lenovo 2992E5U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 2992E5U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory5.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '17 at 16:02
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 119
62% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 119
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 3083) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4653
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
789GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 128
Write 131
Mixed 100
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.18
72% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
261GB free
Firmware: KC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 111
Write 111
Mixed 79.6
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.58
111% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
76GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 124
Write 145
Mixed 61.8
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.21
98% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5040ED58E9W1600 Kingston 99P5471-002.A00LF Kingston 99U5458-008.A00LF Kingston 99P5471-002.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2992E5U Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 2992E5U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $497
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback