Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 15 '22 at 10:06
Run Duration	83 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-12xx v2 (Ivy Bridge) 49 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Memory 67.4 1-Core 155 2-Core 335 96% 186 Pts	4-Core 611 8-Core 625 82% 618 Pts	64-Core 635 39% 635 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 118B) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	3.08% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 3.9 3% 3.6 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 4.9 3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.08% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 69GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,049 Write 1,753 Mixed 1,263 306% 1355 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 68.9 4K Mixed 45.8 147% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 206 154% 205 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x8GB 5,342 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	74.6% Very good	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 26 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 25.9 SC Mixed 20.3 61% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 145%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16