| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-F (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180509 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 18 '22 at 15:34 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
50.7%
Above average
|
62% 109 Pts
|
27% 190 Pts
|
11% 184 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 8616) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24%
Poor
|
25% 30 fps
|
22% 28.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 344 351 143 53 52 MB/s
|
61.3%
Good
|
56% 249 MB/s
|
90% 31.9 MB/s
|
152% 204 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
462GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 105 105 106 105 MB/s
|
60.2%
Good
|
68% 92.9 MB/s
|
164% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 8G-2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
28.9%
Poor
|
28% 9.93 GB/s
|
23% 8.07 GB/s
|
36% 112 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-F Builds (Compare 197 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-F
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples | 42x |
| Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 39x |
| Core i3-6100Intel $51Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 18x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 35x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 18x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $159 |