Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210910
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 24 '22 at 23:14
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	91%

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	53.1% Above average	Memory 39.9 1-Core 78.7 2-Core 188 52% 102 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 477 53% 419 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 101%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB 1,660 User benchmarks, average bench 427% 4TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 695 618 569 566 578 590 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 444 Write 356 Mixed 290 SusWrite 603 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 20.4 4K Mixed 11.8 41% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 250 DQ Mixed 119 126% 208 MB/s
Poor: 147% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 672%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Apacer 78.CAGP7.40C0B 2x8GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 9.8 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 4.9 15% 5.27 GB/s	Latency 203 20% 203 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 55%

Yacht

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	17x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $97Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	14x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	26x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	14x
Aegis DDR4 2400 C17 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 83%, 184 samples	11x

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $402

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16