Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4010U-$280 12,162 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Memory 30.5 1-Core 18.5 2-Core 34.8 18% 27.9 Pts	4-Core 51.5 8-Core 52.3 7% 51.9 Pts	64-Core 52 3% 52 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0775) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	0.56% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 1 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 1.4 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.8 1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.56% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Techman SCSH01 64GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 180 171 174 157 173 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 363 Write 178 Mixed 176 SusWrite 171 49% 222 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 20.2 4K Mixed 14.3 50% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 86.3 DQ Mixed 63.3 59% 93.3 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS512MSK64W6H HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 8.2 21% 7.5 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 5.9 14% 4.97 GB/s	Latency 252 16% 252 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	417x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x

RAM
ACR16D3LS1NBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 1,256 samples	25x
SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 1x4GBSmartBench 24%, 2,696 samples	21x
AM1L16BC2P1-B1FS Kingston ACR16D3LS1NBG/4G 6GBAdataBench 43%, 155 samples	14x

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $309

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16