Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170626
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '17 at 21:54
Run Duration	348 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 195 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 498 55% 433 Pts	64-Core 497 31% 497 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Nvidia(10DE 083D) 1GB CLim: 650 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Lighting 13.9 Reflection 16.4 Parallax 12.5 11% 14.3 fps	MRender 19.7 Gravity 14.1 Splatting 16.3 14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 16 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 46 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 66 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 13 (F1) Unknown 99 99 334256629	78.6% Very good	Read 497 Write 398 Mixed 405 96% 433 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 72.6 4K Mixed 20.1 110% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 30.3 DQ Write 68.8 DQ Mixed 19.8 24% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 124%
JetFlash TS4GJFV30 4GB 222 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	6.08% Terrible	Read 19.9 Write 4.75 Mixed 1 7% 8.56 MB/s	4K Read 8.81 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 34% 2.95 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.08% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-016.A 2x4GB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 2 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	45.1% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 14 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 10.8 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	11x
@ 3.20GHzIntelBench 80%, 61 samples	4x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	6x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	4x

SSD
ELITE 512GBZeplinBench 64%, 15 samples	3x
Agility 3 240GBOCZ $199Bench 52%, 10,165 samples	2x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	2x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3 2x8GBTeamBench 51%, 28 samples	3x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 4x4GBCorsairBench 76%, 42 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16