Dell Latitude E6440

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemDell Latitude E6440  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 02P3T1
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 15 '23 at 12:48
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Memory 31.7
1-Core 50
2-Core 82.2
31% 54.6 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 131
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8600M
Dell(1028 05BD) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.20913.2000
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 8.8
5% 6.97 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 7.2
6% 7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INIC6081SSDWP 128GB
56GB free
Firmware: INICWP00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 304 316 318 370 434 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.5% Good
Read 236
Write 235
Mixed 297
SusWrite 340
63% 277 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 27.2
89% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 174
134% 184 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 102%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 37 29 38 23 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 59.3
Write 60.5
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 29.4
33% 44.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
28% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 10.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 245
16% 245 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6440 Builds (Compare 1,760 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback