Toshiba Satellite C40-A

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite C40-A (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130701
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '23 at 18:46
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	49.3% Average	Memory 68.9 1-Core 75.1 2-Core 121 54% 88.2 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 175 23% 174 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA50) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.02% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 2.6 3% 2.73 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.3 3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.02% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB 8,135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: H190117D SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 126 90 67 73 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 414 Write 334 Mixed 360 SusWrite 101 68% 303 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 31.2 115% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 92.2 104% 178 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 99%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 167GB free Firmware: AM003M SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 109 109 111 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 97.6 Write 101 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 109 60% 82.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.5% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 14.5 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 13.5 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	36	30	60	14"	1366 768	CMN1480

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C40-A Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C40-A

CPU
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	29x
Celeron 1037UIntelBench 43%, 2,458 samples	7x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	5x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	33x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	15x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	6x

SSD
SSD 240GBGigabyte $30Bench 73%, 20,238 samples	4x
P3-512 512GBBench 75%, 2,855 samples	3x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	4x
TSB16D3LS1KBG/4G Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GBKingstonBench 48%, 39 samples	4x
M471B5674QH0-YK0 1x2GBSamsungBench 17%, 2,147 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16