Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7- 4850 25 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Memory 51.9 1-Core 37.3 2-Core 75 34% 54.7 Pts	4-Core 142 8-Core 284 25% 213 Pts	64-Core 678 42% 678 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 399GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 1,163 Write 451 Mixed 619 163% 744 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 40.6 4K Mixed 18.5 94% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 93.7 DQ Write 55.9 DQ Mixed 30.9 35% 60.2 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 223GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 469 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 21 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 66 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 8 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1110522339	39.2% Below average	Read 198 Write 158 Mixed 159 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 27.8 4K Mixed 13.6 67% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 24.5 DQ Write 56 DQ Mixed 13.2 18% 31.2 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M393B1K73CHD-YF8 32x8GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 32 of 64 slots used 256GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	43.7% Average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 18.5 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16