Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170908
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '17 at 17:27
Run Duration	243 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 83.1 1-Core 113 2-Core 225 79% 140 Pts	4-Core 445 8-Core 746 73% 596 Pts	64-Core 934 58% 934 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 9580) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Lighting 69.3 Reflection 71.6 Parallax 87.6 56% 76.2 fps	MRender 71.5 Gravity 68.2 Splatting 58.5 53% 66.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 362GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 33 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 3 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 61 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 233264313	100% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 414 Mixed 421 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 81.1 4K Mixed 39.8 157% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 76.4 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 23.9 52% 103 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 87GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 101 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 15 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 56 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 812787703	105% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 414 Mixed 422 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 83.9 4K Mixed 41.4 160% 55.6 MB/s	DQ Read 258 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 103 114% 192 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 134%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199 19,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 39230232211385 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 366 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 360 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 105 105 10291532 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 360 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 696432 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 42 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 696432 (F2) Unknown 100 100 507140 (F9) Unknown 100 100 29822	53.4% Above average	Read 377 Write 146 Mixed 218 54% 247 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 70.5 4K Mixed 12.4 95% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 24.6 DQ Write 70.3 DQ Mixed 11.7 19% 35.6 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 88%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 36GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13549 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 51 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 53 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 9 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3874751242	76.8% Very good	Read 378 Write 305 Mixed 313 74% 332 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 65 4K Mixed 32.8 135% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 34.9 DQ Write 63 DQ Mixed 20.4 24% 39.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 669GB free Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 109823552 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5978 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 46 44 6738881431090 (09) Power-on hours count 62 62 33348 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 351 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 131074 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 67 51 4850516001 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 16 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 409551 (C2) HDA temperature 33 49 -140737488355295 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -37439229906879 (F1) Unknown 100 253 35939573930 (F2) Unknown 100 253 28106222418	89.6% Excellent	Read 178 Write 135 Mixed 108 104% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.23 75% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 114%
PI-202US SATA/USB20 Drive 1.5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 200GB free, PID 1640 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 33.9 Mixed 10.1 31% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 0.14 4K Mixed 0.12 11% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$60 17,279 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 43.9 MC Write 40.8 MC Mixed 36.6 116% 40.4 GB/s	SC Read 24.9 SC Write 37.6 SC Mixed 28.8 87% 30.4 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	87x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $265Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16