Asrock X299 Killer SLI/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X299 Killer SLI/ac  (all builds)
Memory18 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '23 at 23:28
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7640X-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 252
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 408
44% 348 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
Gigabyte(1458 22C7) 2GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 31.7
20% 27.7 fps
MRender 23.9
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 26.6
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 EVO 120GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 143 143 139 140 138 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 489
Write 470
Mixed 399
SusWrite 174
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 52.5
171% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 356
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 116%
Fusion-io 1.65TB ioScale2
364GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 669 679 695 725 733 730 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 122%
Dell PERC H700 15.5TB
11.5TB free
Firmware: 2.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 301 314 313 317 322 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Samsung MZ7LM3T8HMLP-00005 4TB
659GB free
Firmware: GXT50P4Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 417 422 455 456 454 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 455
Mixed 369
SusWrite 436
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 39.5
98% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 350
266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 1280 720 AOC3202 Q32G2WG4+
Typical X299 Killer SLI/ac Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Killer SLI/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $975
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback