Packard EasyNote TM85

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard EasyNote TM85 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EasyNote TM85
Memory	4.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100422
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '16 at 00:06
Run Duration	254 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	59%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 330 14,119 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Memory 30.3 1-Core 19.5 2-Core 33.6 18% 27.8 Pts	4-Core 39.7 8-Core 47.4 6% 43.6 Pts	64-Core 45.3 3% 45.3 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320M 1,680 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 036D) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4192 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.43% Terrible	Lighting 1.37 Reflection 2.31 Parallax 0.59 1% 1.42 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 2.52 2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.43% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 21860556 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -84593675862012 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 18 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 14 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 44 46 98787262508 (C2) HDA temperature 44 46 98787262508 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 21860556 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 21860556 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 21860556 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 58 (EA) Unknown 0 0 93 (F1) Unknown 0 0 93 (F2) Unknown 0 0 43 (F4) Unknown 100 100 1441808	36.7% Below average	Read 247 Write 125 Mixed 168 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 13.5 57% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 49 DQ Write 45.2 DQ Mixed 19.9 22% 38 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 73%
WD 2500BEV External 250GB 326 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 90GB free, PID 0702 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 25.8 Write 23.1 Mixed 24.4 31% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.31 57% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 20%
SDHC Card 8GB 4,464 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 7GB free, PID null Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 21.9 Write 11.7 Mixed 13.8 18% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 1.13 100% 1.96 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 ACR256X64D3S1333C9 6GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	9.64% Terrible	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 4.1 10% 3.47 GB/s	SC Read 1 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 1.5 4% 1.37 GB/s	Latency 253 16% 253 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.64% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EasyNote TM85 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TM85

CPU
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples	15x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	10x
Core i3 M 330IntelBench 38%, 14,119 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce GT 420MNvidiaBench 2%, 1,922 samples	20x
GeForce GT 320MNvidiaBench 1%, 1,680 samples	18x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	8x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
S280 1TBKingdianBench 85%, 769 samples	2x

RAM
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	6x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 28%, 1,570 samples	4x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16