ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba SATELLITE L850-16D

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L850-16D (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '18 at 19:45
Run Duration	87 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 90 2-Core 176 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 433 45% 363 Pts	64-Core 436 27% 436 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M 7,895 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	5.07% Terrible	Lighting 6.6 Reflection 6.58 Parallax 5.31 5% 6.16 fps	MRender 5.62 Gravity 4.73 Splatting 5.91 4% 5.42 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.07% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB7S512G 512GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 437GB free (System drive) Firmware: X3540000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 1953 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1172 (A5) Unknown 100 100 30116741762 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 34 (A8) Unknown 100 100 19 (A9) Unknown 100 100 700 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 10 (AE) Unknown 100 100 9 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 72 45 193274445852 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1129595928874 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 5016 (EA) Unknown 100 100 6682 (F1) Unknown 253 253 5261 (F2) Unknown 253 253 6172 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	88.1% Excellent	Read 511 Write 464 Mixed 372 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 40.4 4K Mixed 24.2 86% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 10.8 84% 197 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 BKH400SO51208-1333 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.5% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 15 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 14.3 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback