MSI MS-16J3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GP62 2QE
MotherboardMSI MS-16J3  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150826
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateJan 30 '18 at 08:59
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 75.1
1-Core 43
2-Core 150
52% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 220
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 114C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 4.03
3% 7.68 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 1.83
Splatting 6.43
4% 4.41 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 501ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.1% Below average
Read 196
Write 104
Mixed 126
31% 142 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 4.54
43% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 98.8
DQ Mixed 22.9
40% 77.1 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$22
409GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 106
Write 99.9
Mixed 105
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.21
77% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 0467 RMT3160ED58E9W1600 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.8% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 13.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 16.6
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J3 Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback