ECS A75F-M2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardECS A75F-M2  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121120
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '18 at 14:32
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 45.4
2-Core 92.5
45% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 178
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 20
18% 19.6 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 16.7
17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata S511 120GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.3.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
43% Average
Read 311
Write 131
Mixed 159
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 10.7
67% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 32.3
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 11.5
26% 51 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 43%
Great: 81%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
333GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 115
Write 117
Mixed 25.8
62% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.32
91% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 69%
I-O DATA HDCL-UT 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 014a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 183
Write 188
Mixed 136
214% 169 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.33
68% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 74%
I-O DATA HDC-U 250GB
2GB free, PID 010f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 29.7
Mixed 26.2
37% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.38
51% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMD-4G68H1P-16K 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A75F-M2 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A75F-M2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $239
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback