Fujitsu D3161-A1

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Fujitsu D3161-A1 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3161-A1
Memory	6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141201
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '18 at 17:43
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 88.5 2-Core 145 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 217 8-Core 217 29% 217 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53% Above average	Lighting 65.8 Reflection 64.5 Parallax 56.4 54% 62.2 fps	MRender 66.5 Gravity 61.3 Splatting 62.8 52% 63.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.9% Average	Read 251 Write 139 Mixed 143 39% 178 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 23.2 4K Mixed 20.4 75% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 80.4 DQ Mixed 43.2 52% 93.9 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 306GB free Firmware: HP16 Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 146 Write 130 Mixed 133 103% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.31 104% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 112%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 120GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 111 Write 100 Mixed 95.5 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 0.25 97% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.9% Average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 12.6 38% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 13.8 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical D3161-A1 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu D3161-A1

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	2x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	1x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x
SSD 128GBIntensoBench 63%, 1,375 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-CK0 16GBSamsungBench 51%, 2 samples	2x
M378B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 4,484 samples	1x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $334

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16