Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	73.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	60.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170914
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '18 at 15:18
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% , 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 71.7 1-Core 131 2-Core 223 79% 142 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 848 75% 636 Pts	64-Core 1,354 84% 1,354 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Asus(1043 8549) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.6% Very good	Lighting 94.1 Reflection 97.9 Parallax 88.8 77% 93.6 fps	MRender 85.1 Gravity 85.7 Splatting 79 68% 83.3 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 836GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 1,694 Write 1,259 Mixed 1,275 313% 1,409 MB/s	4K Read 42.1 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 46.2 181% 66.2 MB/s	DQ Read 572 DQ Write 379 DQ Mixed 178 213% 376 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 302%
Adata SP600 512GB 162 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 369GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.7E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 479 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 347 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 8 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 199 199 4296146955 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2208 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 86 (C2) HDA temperature 73 73 115965624347 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 13451179776 (EA) Unknown 100 100 16508374336 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 10311106060 (F2) Unknown 100 100 11836394116	84.7% Excellent	Read 474 Write 376 Mixed 427 95% 426 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 73.7 4K Mixed 24 107% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 232 DQ Write 252 DQ Mixed 36.3 84% 174 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 105%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2.5TB free Firmware: ABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 153 153 34386411863 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 498 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1043 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 455 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 570 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 570 (C2) HDA temperature 250 250 210454446104 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	94.5% Outstanding	Read 150 Write 180 Mixed 168 125% 166 MB/s	4K Read 0.99 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.17 92% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 107%
USB Flash Disk 4GB 2,580 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 26.1 17% 26.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 8x8GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 46 MC Mixed 25.6 92% 32.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 9.1 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 97.6 41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	104x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	69x
Core i9-7900XIntel $413Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	66x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	50x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x

SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	23x
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)WD $37Bench 244%, 109,999 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $67Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	18x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	74x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	47x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $840

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16