Asrock J3160DC-ITX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock J3160DC-ITX  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160331
Uptime12.5 Days
Run DateMar 02 '18 at 18:43
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3160
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Memory 50.1
1-Core 22.5
2-Core 44.8
27% 39.1 Pts
4-Core 72.7
8-Core 72.1
10% 72.4 Pts
64-Core 85.5
5% 85.5 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
ASRock(1849 22B1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 3.42
Parallax 2.81
2% 2.76 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.22 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.02%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 168
Write 140
Mixed 137
112% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.12
47% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF25664HZ-1G4M1 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.2% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback